Validating crtical thinking uk gay dating sites
Research show that students grow in their CT abilities during college [5–8], but growth is slow and limited [4, 9–11].There is however a lack of validated tests for CT development in Dutch speaking university students.The latter is exemplified by the variety of existing definitions on CT [14–17].At least two different considerations of the conceptualisation of CT can be discerned: (1) considering CT as discipline-specific and/or discipline-general and (2) considering CT as a set of skills or as a combination of skills with a disposition to be a “critical thinker”.The Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal  aims at measuring CT as it is defined by Glaser :(1) an attitude of being disposed to consider in a thoughtful way the problems and subjects that come within the range of one’s experience; (2) knowledge of the methods of logical inquiry and reasoning; and (3) some skill in applying those methods.Critical thinking calls for a persistent effort to examine any belief or supposed form of knowledge in the light of the evidence that supports it and the further conclusions to which it tends. 5)The Cornell Critical Thinking Test (CCTT)  is inspired by the Cornell/Illinois model of CT.Such instructional interventions are mostly conducted within one discipline, and hence, instruments need to be reliable within a restricted population.
In a dispositional viewpoint, the motivation and the commitment of a person are included too, to see whether a person is able to recognize and willing to use the needed CT .
Centre for Educational Effectiveness and Evaluation, KU Leuven, Dekenstraat 2, P. Box 3773, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Received 26 June 2013; Revised 11 September 2013; Accepted 16 September 2013Academic Editor: Lieven Verschaffel Copyright © 2013 An Verburgh et al.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The discipline-specific movement, with Mc Peck  as leading figure, considers CT to be dependent on the problem area or the discipline under consideration.
He argues that what counts as an appropriate use of scepticism in one discipline or context might be inappropriate in another.
The development of critical thinking (CT) is generally acknowledged as an important aim of higher education [1–4].